4.7 Article

Anti-swing sliding mode control of three-dimensional double pendulum overhead cranes based on extended state observer

期刊

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
卷 111, 期 1, 页码 391-410

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-022-07859-9

关键词

Three-dimensional double pendulum crane; Anti-swing; Sliding mode; Differential flatness; Differential Tracker; Extended state observer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a coordinated control method for the double pendulum crane in three-dimensional motion mode, achieving anti-swing control and fast accurate positioning through model establishment, sliding mode control, and extended state observer.
When the double pendulum crane works in three-dimensional motion mode, it can significantly improve transportation efficiency. However, controlling the two-stage swing angles in the three-dimensional motion mode is complex and challenging. This paper presents a coordinated control method for the track and trolley of the double pendulum crane to improve the working efficiency of the crane, which realizes the anti-swing control of the double pendulum crane in three-dimensional movement mode. A three-dimensional double pendulum crane model is established, and the model is simplified by the differential flatness theory. A sliding mode control (SMC) method with an extended state observer (ESO) is designed to position and two-stage swing suppression of the three-dimensional double pendulum crane. For the actuator deadband, a transition process is introduced. The stability of the system is analyzed by the Lyapunov method. The proposed method has strong robustness and anti-interference ability. Theoretical and experimental results show that the proposed method can achieve fast and accurate positioning and effectively suppress the two-stage swing. This method is introduced into a nonlinear experimental platform. Compared with other technologies in the literature, the proposed method shortens the transit time, improves work efficiency, and reduces the safety risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据