4.7 Article

Vibration analysis of nonlinear damping systems by the discrete incremental harmonic balance method

期刊

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
卷 111, 期 3, 页码 2009-2028

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-022-07953-y

关键词

Incremental harmonic balance method; Discrete node process; Equivalent piecewise-linearization; Nonlinear damping system; Hysteretic system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An improved incremental harmonic balance method (IHBM) is proposed to solve periodic responses of continuous nonlinear stiffness systems. This paper focuses on investigating nonlinear damping parts using the proposed IHBM method. The study demonstrates that the method can accurately obtain the dynamics of nonlinear systems.
An improved incremental harmonic balance method (IHBM) is proposed by Wang (J Sound Vib 441:111-125, 2019) to solve the periodic responses of the continuous nonlinear stiffness systems. However, the nonlinear damping systems remain unsolved. This paper aims to investigate the nonlinear damping parts by the proposed IHBM method, which is based on the principle that any continuous curve can be approximated by a piecewise-linear curve with discrete nodes. The piecewise-linear function can be considered a unified benchmark function that can convert the complex IHBM Galerkin process of arbitrary nonlinear damping systems to that of unified piecewise-linear damping systems. The general process of the proposed method for this piecewise-linear system is derived considering the stability of the solutions. Then, a polynomial nonlinear damping system is investigated to validate the accuracy of the method. Furthermore, five typical cases of single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) nonlinear damping systems are carried out, and this method is also extended to multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) systems where each nonlinear force in the systems is expressed by the function of only one independent DOF. The results illustrate that the proposed method shows convenience and accuracy in obtaining the dynamics of nonlinear systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据