4.6 Article

An F-box protein attenuates fungal xylanase-triggered immunity by destabilizing LRR-RLP NbEIX2 in a SOBIR1-dependent manner

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 236, 期 6, 页码 2202-2215

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.18509

关键词

E3 ligase; Nicotiana benthamiana; pattern-triggered immunity; SCF complex; ubiquitination

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32100155]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20221000]
  3. Open Project of Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Eco-Agricultural Biotechnology around Hongze Lake [HZHLAB2102]
  4. China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA [CARS-24-C-01]
  5. Jiangsu Funding Program for Excellent Postdoctoral Talent [2022ZB343, 2022ZB768]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals a distinct model of NbEIX2 degradation, in which an F-box protein NbPFB1 destabilizes NbEIX2 indirectly in a SOBIR1-dependent manner.
Receptor-like proteins (RLPs) lacking the cytoplasmic kinase domain play crucial roles in plant growth, development and immunity. However, what remains largely elusive is whether RLP protein levels are fine-tuned by E3 ubiquitin ligases, which are employed by receptor-like kinases for signaling attenuation. Nicotiana benthamiana NbEIX2 is a leucine-rich repeat RLP (LRR-RLP) that mediates fungal xylanase-triggered immunity. Here we show that NbEIX2 associates with an F-box protein NbPFB1, which promotes NbEIX2 degradation likely by forming an SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, and negatively regulates NbEIX2-mediated immune responses. NbEIX2 undergoes ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation in planta. Interestingly, NbEIX2 without its cytoplasmic tail is still associated with and destabilized by NbPFB1. In addition, NbPFB1 also associates with and destabilizes NbSOBIR1, a co-receptor of LRR-RLPs, and fails to promote NbEIX2 degradation in the sobir1 mutant. Our findings reveal a distinct model of NbEIX2 degradation, in which an F-box protein destabilizes NbEIX2 indirectly in a SOBIR1-dependent manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据