4.6 Article

How broad is the selfing syndrome? Insights from convergent evolution of gene expression across species and tissues in the Capsella genus

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 236, 期 6, 页码 2344-2357

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.18477

关键词

Capsella; convergent adaptation; gene expression; genomic and selfing syndromes; mating system change; relaxed selection

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [2019-00806]
  2. [2018-05973]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transition from outcrossing to selfing is a significant evolutionary event in plants, impacting reproductive traits and gene expression. Research in the Capsella genus shows that gene expression tends to converge in flowers in selfing species, while diverging in leaves and roots.
The shift from outcrossing to selfing is one of the main evolutionary transitions in plants. It is accompanied by profound effects on reproductive traits, the so-called selfing syndrome. Because the transition to selfing also implies deep genomic and ecological changes, one also expects to observe a genomic selfing syndrome. We took advantage of the three independent transitions from outcrossing to selfing in the Capsella genus to characterize the overall impact of mating system change on RNA expression, in flowers but also in leaves and roots. We quantified the extent of both selfing and genomic syndromes, and tested whether changes in expression corresponded to adaptation to selfing or to relaxed selection on traits that were constrained in outcrossers. Mating system change affected gene expression in all three tissues but more so in flowers than in roots and leaves. Gene expression in selfing species tended to converge in flowers but diverged in the two other tissues. Hence, convergent adaptation to selfing dominates in flowers, whereas genetic drift plays a more important role in leaves and roots. The effect of mating system transition is not limited to reproductive tissues and corresponds to both adaptation to selfing and relaxed selection on previously constrained traits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据