4.8 Article

Bedaquiline-Pretomanid-Linezolid Regimens for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 387, 期 9, 页码 810-823

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119430

关键词

-

资金

  1. TB Alliance
  2. Australia Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  4. Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany through Kf W [OPP1129600]
  5. Irish Aid
  6. Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  7. U.K. Department of Health
  8. U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
  9. U.S. Agency for International Development
  10. U.K. Research and Innovation Medical Research Council
  11. [MC_UU_00004/04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study enrolled 181 participants with 84% to 93% achieving favorable outcomes across all four bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid treatment groups, with the group receiving 600 mg of linezolid daily for 26 weeks reporting fewer adverse events.
BACKGROUND The bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid regimen has been reported to have 90% efficacy against highly drug-resistant tuberculosis, but the incidence of adverse events with 1200 mg of linezolid daily has been high. The appropriate dose of linezolid and duration of treatment with this agent to minimize toxic effects while maintaining efficacy against highly drug-resistant tuberculosis are unclear. METHODS We enrolled participants with extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (i.e., resistant to rifampin, a f luoroquinolone, and an aminoglycoside), pre-XDR tuber-culosis (i.e., resistant to rifampin and to either a f luoroquinolone or an aminogly-coside), or rifampin-resistant tuberculosis that was not responsive to treatment or for which a second-line regimen had been discontinued because of side effects. We randomly assigned the participants to receive bedaquiline for 26 weeks (200 mg daily for 8 weeks, then 100 mg daily for 18 weeks), pretomanid (200 mg daily for 26 weeks), and daily linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks or 600 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks. The primary end point in the modified intention-to-treat population was the incidence of an unfavorable outcome, defined as treat-ment failure or disease relapse (clinical or bacteriologic) at 26 weeks after comple-tion of treatment. Safety was also evaluated. RESULTS A total of 181 participants were enrolled, 88% of whom had XDR or pre-XDR tuber-culosis. Among participants who received bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid with linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks or 600 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks, 93%, 89%, 91%, and 84%, respectively, had a favorable outcome; peripheral neuropathy occurred in 38%, 24%, 24%, and 13%, respectively; myelo-suppression occurred in 22%, 15%, 2%, and 7%, respectively; and the linezolid dose was modified (i.e., interrupted, reduced, or discontinued) in 51%, 30%, 13%, and 13%, respectively. Optic neuropathy developed in 4 participants (9%) who had received linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks; all the cases resolved. Six of the seven unfavorable microbiologic outcomes through 78 weeks of follow-up oc-curred in participants assigned to the 9-week linezolid groups. CONCLUSIONS A total of 84 to 93% of the participants across all four bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid treatment groups had a favorable outcome. The overall risk-benefit ratio favored the group that received the three-drug regimen with linezolid at a dose of 600 mg for 26 weeks, with a lower incidence of adverse events reported and fewer linezolid dose modifications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据