4.5 Review

The prevalence of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS): a systematic review and meta-analysis-an update

期刊

NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 67-82

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06364-6

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Restless legs syndrome; Prevalence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that the pooled prevalence of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in multiple sclerosis (MS) cases is 28%, with a higher prevalence in women (30%) compared to men (22%). The prevalence of RLS in the control group was 8%.
Introduction The prevalence of restless legs syndrome (RLS) is reported to vary in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in studies which are conducted in different populations. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to update the prevalence of RLS in MS cases. Methods We searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and gray literature including references from identified studies and conference abstracts which were published up to June 2021. Data on the total number of participants, first author, country, disease duration, number of controls, mean patient age, male and female numbers, mean EDSS, and number of cases and/or controls with RLS were extracted from the included studies. Results The literature search revealed 855 articles; after deleting duplicates, 530 remained. For the meta-analysis, 75 studies were included (Fig. 1). In six articles, the authors did not differentiate between CIS and MS cases when reporting RLS cases. In total, 15,411 MS/CIS patients were evaluated and 4309 had RLS. The pooled prevalence of RLS was 28% (95% CI: 24-33%). The pooled prevalence of RLS in men was 22% (95% CI: 17-26%), and the pooled prevalence of RLS in women was 30% (95% CI: 25-35%). The pooled prevalence of RLS in controls was 8% (95% CI: 6-10%). Conclusion The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that the pooled prevalence of RLS is 28% in MS cases and 8%. The pooled prevalence is higher in women than men (30% vs 22%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据