4.6 Article

Learning to localize image forgery using end-to-end attention network

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 512, 期 -, 页码 25-39

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.060

关键词

Image forgery; Splicing; Copy-move; Channel attention; Content authentication

资金

  1. Khalifa Univer- sity
  2. [CIRA-2019-047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a novel algorithm for localizing forged regions in digital images. The proposed algorithm utilizes channel attention convolutional blocks to infer the forged regions and extracts features in the spatial and frequency domains. Rigorous experiments demonstrate that the algorithm outperforms existing methods on benchmark datasets for localizing various manipulations.
Recent advancements have increased the prevalence of digital image tampering. Anyone can manipulate multimedia content using editing software to alter the semantic meaning of images to deceive viewers. Since manipulations appear realistic, both humans and machines face challenges detecting forgeries. We propose a novel algorithm for authenticating visual content by localizing forged regions in this work. Our proposed algorithm employs channel attention convolutional blocks in an end-to-end learning frame-work. The channel attention infers forged regions in an image by extracting attention-aware multi -resolution features in the spatial domain and features in the frequency domain. Therefore, the proposed network is divided into two subnetworks, for extracting attention-aware multi-resolution features in the spatial and frequency domain. To predict the resulting mask, we concatenate the features of both net-works. The proposed channel attention network exclusively focuses on the forged region and increases network generalization capabilities on unseen manipulations. Rigorous experiments demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art methods on five benchmark datasets for localizing a wide range of manipulations.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据