4.8 Article

Pilot study of responsive nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation for loss-of-control eating

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 9, 页码 1791-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01941-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [5UH3NS103446-02, 1R01MH124760-01A1]
  2. Blume Foundation
  3. Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award for Medical Scientists [R01MH129018]
  4. John A. Blume Foundation
  5. National Institute of Mental Health [K23 MH106794]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this pilot study, responsive deep brain stimulation (DBS) was used to improve self-control of food intake and weight loss in two patients with binge eating disorder (BED) and severe obesity. Increased low-frequency oscillations in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), recorded during food cravings preceding loss of control (LOC) eating, were used to guide the delivery of DBS. Over 6 months, improved self-control of food intake and weight loss were observed. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to determine the scalability of this approach.
Nucleus accumbens, low-frequency, responsive deep brain stimulation improved self-control of food intake and weight loss in two patients with binge eating disorder and severe obesity Cravings that precede loss of control (LOC) over food consumption present an opportunity for intervention in patients with the binge eating disorder (BED). In this pilot study, we used responsive deep brain stimulation (DBS) to record nucleus accumbens (NAc) electrophysiology during food cravings preceding LOC eating in two patients with BED and severe obesity (trial registration no. NCT03868670). Increased NAc low-frequency oscillations, prominent during food cravings, were used to guide DBS delivery. Over 6 months, we observed improved self-control of food intake and weight loss. These findings provide early support for restoring inhibitory control with electrophysiologically-guided NAc DBS. Further work with increased sample sizes is required to determine the scalability of this approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据