4.8 Article

Intersystem crossing in the entrance channel of the reaction of O(3P) with pyridine

期刊

NATURE CHEMISTRY
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 1405-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41557-022-01047-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian MUR (PRIN 2017) [2017A4XRCA, 2017PJ5XXX]
  2. Italian MUR (PRIN 2020) [202082CE3T]
  3. Italian Space Agency [2019-3-U.0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that intersystem crossing between the pre-reactive complex and the reaction barrier can control the rate of bimolecular reactions for weakly coupled potential energy surfaces, even in the absence of heavy atoms. By conducting crossed-beam experiments and computational simulations, it is found that for the O(P-3) plus pyridine reaction, the main products are pyrrole and CO, obtained through a spin-forbidden ring-contraction mechanism. The reaction rates at low to moderate temperatures are mainly dominated by intersystem crossing.
Two quantum effects can enable reactions to take place at energies below the barrier separating reactants from products: tunnelling and intersystem crossing between coupled potential energy surfaces. Here we show that intersystem crossing in the region between the pre-reactive complex and the reaction barrier can control the rate of bimolecular reactions for weakly coupled potential energy surfaces, even in the absence of heavy atoms. For O(P-3) plus pyridine, a reaction relevant to combustion, astrochemistry and biochemistry, crossed-beam experiments indicate that the dominant products are pyrrole and CO, obtained through a spin-forbidden ring-contraction mechanism. The experimental findings are interpreted-by high-level quantum-chemical calculations and statistical non-adiabatic computations of branching fractions-in terms of an efficient intersystem crossing occurring before the high entrance barrier for 0-atom addition to the N-atom lone pair. At low to moderate temperatures, the computed reaction rates prove to be dominated by intersystem crossing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据