4.8 Article

Low-loading gold in situ doped with sulfur by biomolecule-assisted approach for promoted electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 2059-2064

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4878-3

关键词

electrochemical CO2 reduction; nanocomposites; heterogeneous catalyst; in situ sulfured; heteroatoms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a catalyst featuring uniform S-doped Au nanoparticles on N-doped carbon support (S-Au/NC) was designed and prepared. The S-Au/NC catalyst showed high activity and selectivity for CO2RR, with excellent long-term stability. The study also revealed that the S dopant can enhance the activity by reducing the free energy change of the potential-limiting step.
For electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction (CO2RR), CO2-to-CO conversion is considered an ideal route towards carbon neutrality for practical applications. Gold (Au) is known as a promising catalyst with high selectivity for CO; however, it suffers from high cost and low mass-specific activity. In this study, we design and prepare a catalyst featuring uniform S-doped Au nanoparticles on N-doped carbon support (denoted as S-Au/NC) by an in situ synthesis strategy using biomolecules. The S-Au/NC displays high activity and selectivity for CO in CO2RR with a Au loading as low as 0.4 wt.%. The Faradaic efficiency of CO (FECO) for S-Au/NC is above 95% at 0.75 V (vs. RHE); by contrast, the FECO of Au/NC (without S) is only 58%. The Tafel slope is 77.4 mV center dot dec(-1), revealing a favorable kinetics process. Furthermore, S-Au/NC exhibits an excellent long-term stability for CO2RR. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that the S dopant can boost the activity by reducing the free energy change of the potential-limiting step (formation of the *COOH intermediate). This work not only demonstrates a model catalyst featuring significantly reduced use of noble metals, but also establishes an in situ synthesis strategy for preparing high-performance catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据