4.7 Article

Stability analysis of planetary systems via second-order Renyi entropy

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac3010

关键词

celestial mechanics; planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability; chaos; methods: numerical

资金

  1. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the National Research Development and Innovation Fund [UNKP-21-3]
  2. Wigner Scientific Computing Laboratory (WSCLAB) of the Wigner Research Centre for Physics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The long-term dynamical evolution plays a crucial role in planetary research. This paper proposes a stability analysis method based on the generalized Renyi entropy, which is obtained from scalar measurements. By reconstructing the phase space using radial velocity data, Poincare's recurrence theorem helps to obtain the Renyi entropy. The results show that the entropy-based stability analysis is consistent with other chaos detection methods and only requires a relatively short integration time.
The long-term dynamical evolution is a crucial point in recent planetary research. Although the amount of observational data are continuously growing and the precision allows us to obtain accurate planetary orbits, the canonical stability analysis still requires N-body simulations and phase space trajectory investigations. We propose a method for stability analysis of planetary motion based on the generalized Renyi entropy obtained from a scalar measurement. The radial velocity data of the central body in the gravitational three-body problem are used as the basis of a phase space reconstruction procedure. Then, Poincare's recurrence theorem contributes to finding a natural partitioning in the reconstructed phase space to obtain the Renyi entropy. It turns out that the entropy-based stability analysis is in good agreement with other chaos detection methods, and it requires only a few tens of thousands of orbital period integration time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据