4.2 Article

Nanographene laser-pyrolyzed paper electrodes for the impedimetric detection of D-glucose via a molecularly imprinted polymer

期刊

MONATSHEFTE FUR CHEMIE
卷 153, 期 12, 页码 1129-1135

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00706-022-02997-7

关键词

Nanographene; D-Glucose sensor; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; Capacitance; Paper electrodes

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2017/10522-5, 2018/14425-7, 2018/08782-1, 2018/13922-7, 2019/11214-8]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [001, 25/2014]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [305605/2017-8, 302839/2020-8, 145833/2020-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this proof-of-concept study, laser-pyrolyzed paper was used as supporting electrodes for the swift, impedimetric, and enzymeless detection of D-glucose using molecularly imprinted polymer. The results showed good analytical performance, reproducibility, and selectivity.
In this proof-of-concept study, we used laser-pyrolyzed paper as the supporting electrodes for the swift, impedimetric, and enzymeless detection of D-glucose by the means of molecularly imprinted polymer. Molecular imprinting of monomer 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoic acid was performed by electrochemical polymerization in the presence of D-glucoseas a template molecule, followed by the template removal process via cyclic voltammetry in PBS (pH = 7.4). The analytical capacitance signal was extracted from the raw electrochemical impedance spectra recorded after only 60 s of incubation with the analyte. The electrodes were characterized by Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy to disclose their structural and morphological properties, revealing the presence of nanographene of high porosity. The analytical performance was investigated in the clinically relevant range of 0-30 mmol dm(-3), which demonstrated good linearity (r(2) = 0.97), decent limit of detection (1.77 mmol dm(-3)), an excellent selectivity (a = 1.38-3.73), and good reproducibility (5.0%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据