4.6 Article

Europinidin Inhibits Rotenone-Activated Parkinson's Disease in Rodents by Decreasing Lipid Peroxidation and Inflammatory Cytokines Pathways

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27217159

关键词

europinidin; oxidative stress; Parkinson's disease; rotenone

资金

  1. Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia [IF-PSAU-2021/03/18363]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the effects of Europinidin on Parkinson's disease and finds that it possesses antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, and can improve behavioral, biochemical, and neuroinflammatory changes caused by rotenone.
Background: Europinidin is a derivative of delphinidin obtained from the plants Plumbago Europea and Ceratostigma plumbaginoides. This herb has wide medicinal applications in treating various diseases but there are very few studies available on this bioactive compound. Considering this background, the present study is designed for the evaluation of Europinidin against Parkinson's disease. Aim: The investigation aims to assess the effect of Europinidin in the rotenone-activated Parkinson's paradigm. Methods: To evaluate neuroprotective activity, rotenone (1.5 mg/kg s.c) and europinidin (10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg) was administered in rats for 21 days. The behavioural parameters were performed before sacrificing the rats. On the 22nd day, all the rats were assessed for biochemical markers (SOD, GSH, MDA, Catalase), neurotransmitter levels (Dopamine, 5-HIAA, DOPAC, and HVA levels), and neuroinflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha). Results: It was found that rotenone produced significant (p < 0.001) oxidative damage, a cholinergic deficit, dopaminergic loss, and a rise in neuroinflammatory markers in rats. Conclusion: The study concludes that europinidin possesses anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. The results suggest the therapeutic role of europinidin against rotenone-activated behavioural, biochemical, and neuroinflammatory alterations in rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据