4.6 Article

Cellulosic Ethanol Production Using Waste Wheat Stillage after Microwave-Assisted Hydrotropic Pretreatment

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27186097

关键词

microwave-assisted pretreatment; hydrotrope; distillery stillage; bioethanol

资金

  1. [008/RID/2018/19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effect of microwave-assisted pretreatment with NaCS on the production of second-generation bioethanol, showing that this pretreatment method effectively reduced lignin content and hemicellulose, increasing cellulose content in the biomass which led to higher ethanol yield.
One of the key elements influencing the efficiency of cellulosic ethanol production is the effective pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of microwave-assisted pretreatment of wheat stillage in the presence of sodium cumene sulphonate (NaCS) hydrotrope used for the production of second-generation bioethanol. As a result of microwave pretreatment, the composition of the wheat stillage biomass changed significantly when compared with the raw material used, before treatment. Microwave-assisted pretreatment with NaCS effectively reduced the lignin content and hemicellulose, making cellulose the dominant component of biomass, which accounted for 42.91 +/- 0.10%. In post pretreatment, changes in biomass composition were also visible on FTIR spectra. The peaks of functional groups and bonds characteristic of lignins (C-O vibration in the syringyl ring, asymmetric bending in CH3, and aromatic skeleton C-C stretching) decreased. The pretreatment of the analyzed lignocellulosic raw material with NaCS resulted in the complete conversion of glucose to ethanol after 48 h of the process, with yield (in relation to the theoretical one) of above 91%. The highest observed concentration of ethanol, 23.57 +/- 0.10 g/L, indicated the high effectiveness of the method used for the pretreatment of wheat stillage that did not require additional nutrient supplementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据