4.4 Article

MotiQ: an open-source toolbox to quantify the cell motility and morphology of microglia

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E21-11-0585

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Science Foundation [EXC 1023]
  2. Helmholtz Impuls-und Vernetzungsfonds [CoEN 5008]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC2151-390873048]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, the authors introduce an open-source and freely accessible software called MotiQ for automated quantification of microglial motility and morphology. The software is versatile and can be used with various types of data, and its results can be compared with other analysis methods.
Microglia are the primary resident innate immune cells of the CNS. They possess branched, motile cell processes that are important for their cellular functions. To study the pathways that control microglial morphology and motility under physiological and disease conditions, it is necessary to quantify microglial morphology and motility precisely and reliably. Several image analysis approaches are available for the quantification of microglial morphology and motility. However, they are either not automated, not freely accessible, and/or limited in the number of morphology and motility parameters that can be assessed. Thus, we have developed MotiQ, an open-source, freely accessible software for automated quantification of microglial motility and morphology. MotiQ allows quantification of a diverse set of cellular motility and morphology parameters, including the parameters that have become the gold standard in the microglia field. We demonstrate that MotiQ can be applied to in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro data from confocal, epifluorescence, or two-photon microscopy, and we compare its results to other analysis approaches. We suggest MotiQ as a versatile and customizable tool to study microglia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据