4.7 Review

Sensing performance and mechanism of carbon dots encapsulated into metal-organic frameworks

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 189, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-022-05481-5

关键词

Carbon dots; Metal-organic frameworks; Fluorescence; Sensing mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678409]
  2. Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology of China [19JCYBJC19800]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes [Z1-201507]
  4. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Tianjin [TD13-5042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) combined with carbon dots (CDs) form composites with excellent optical properties, which are promising for the preparation of a new generation of fluorescence sensors.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can be combined with nanomaterials and the combined composites have excellent optical properties. Carbon dots (CDs) with tiny particle size, non-toxic and rich surface functional groups are novel fluorescent materials. Carbon dots@metal-organic frameworks (CDs@MOFs) are synthesized by encapsulating CDs into MOFs. CDs@ MOFs are promising composites for the preparation of a new generation of fluorescence sensors, which combine the hybrid properties of MOFs and the special optical properties of CDs. Urged as such, we are encouraged to categorize according to the sensing mechanisms. These include fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ), static quenching, dynamic quenching, photo-induced electron transfer (PET), inner filter effect (IFE) and so on. Based on the above mechanisms, CDs@MOFs can specifically interact with target analytes to generate fluorescence quenching. This review covers the research progress of CDs@MOFs in recent five years (with 103 refs), synthetic design of CDs@ MOFs and introduces the sensing mechanism. The current challenges and future research directions are discussed briefly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据