4.5 Article

Impact of Childbearing Decisions on Family Size of Korean Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

期刊

JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 729-734

出版社

KOREAN ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.729

关键词

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; Family Size; Childbearing Decisions; Korean

资金

  1. Korea Healthcare Technology R&D project, Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Family Affairs, Korea [A080588]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) predominantly affects women in their reproductive years and has a significant impact on childbearing. We investigated the influence of personal decision on family size among Korean women with SLE and factors that affect the decisions. A case-control study comparing childbearing history and decisions of 112 SLE patients and 135 controls was performed. Women with SLE participating in the Network for Lupus Clinical Research in South Korea and matching controls between ages of 18-45, who are/were married or living with a partner were included. Data regarding socio-demographics, reproductive history, and childbearing decisions were collected through a survey using a standardized questionnaire and medical record review. More women with SLE reported at least one pregnancy (85.7% vs. 71.9%, P = 0.009) or at least one live birth (85.7% vs. 71.9%, P = 0.003) compared with controls. Mean number of pregnancies was significantly higher (2.4 +/- 1.6 vs. 1.4 +/- 1.3, P< 0.001), and mean number of live births was significantly lower in women with SLE (1.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.8, P< 0.001). Significantly more women with SLE made the decision not to have children compared with controls (54.5% vs. 40.7%, P = 0.031), and health-related concerns were the major cause of the decision. Other socio-demographic factors did not influence the decision to limit childbearing in SLE women. The disease-related concerns had significant impact on family size and childbearing decisions among Korean women with SLE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据