4.7 Article

Fast sonochemical molecularly imprinted polymer synthesis for selective electrochemical determination of maleic hydrazide

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107634

关键词

Pesticides; Carbon black; Nanoparticles; Electrochemical sensor; Solid-phase extraction; Food samples

资金

  1. PRIN 2017 ACTUaL project of the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR)
  2. Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR)
  3. European Social Fund (ESF) [AIM1894039-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a fast molecularly imprinted polymer method for the synthesis of maleic hydrazide (MH) and combines it with electrochemical determination for the analysis of MH residues in food. The method exhibits good sensitivity, reusability, and fouling resistance, and can be used for the determination of MH in model solutions and food samples.
Maleic hydrazide (MH) is a plant growth regulator, herbicide, and sprout inhibitor used to improve the growth and quality of certain vegetables and fruits, unfortunately, MH has genotoxic and carcinogenic effects; thus MH residues in food deserve to be analyzed. Herein, a fast molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) sonochemical synthesis for MH is proposed. The MIP was used as an adsorbent phase and used in combination with an electrochemical determination based on carbon black functionalized screen-printed electrodes. The MIP was synthesized by radical polymerization in 5 min, by using a high-power ultrasound probe using MH as a template. The electrochemical sensor exhibits useful sensitivity for MH (LOD = 40 ppb), high reusability (RSD 3 %; n = 10) and fouling resistance. The coupling MIP-extraction/clean-up and electrochemical determination were tested towards model solutions and food samples (i.e., potatoes, onions and garlic), obtaining reproducible (RSD & LE; 6 %, n = 3) and selective MH determination. The method's accuracy was proved via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry getting relative errors between 8.5 and 9.4 %.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据