4.7 Article

Hyperspectral imaging coupled with CNN: A powerful approach for quantitative identification of feather meal and fish by-product meal adulterated in marine fishmeal

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107517

关键词

Fishmeal; Adulteration; Quantitative identification; Amino acid; NIR; Convolutional neural network

资金

  1. International S & T Cooperation Program of China [2019YFE0103800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully developed a rapid detection method using NIR-HSI and deep learning models for the identification of marine fishmeal adulterated with low-cost processed animal proteins. The method showed high accuracy and reliability.
Marine fishmeal (MFM) adulterated with low-cost processed animal proteins (PAPs) such as hydrolyzed feather meal (HFM) and fish by-product meal (FBM) has frequently occurred in the Chinese trade market. This commercial fraud generates a serious threat to farmed animal health and even human food safety. This study aims to develop a rapid detection method using near-infrared hyperspectral imaging (NIR-HSI) combined with deep learning modeling for qualitative and quantitative identification of MFM adulterated with HFM, FBM, and the binary adulterant (HFM-FBM). Three convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures with optimized parameters were constructed to predict sample classes, adulterant concentration, and amino acid content of adulterated samples, respectively. Partial least squares (PLS) and support vector machine (SVM) models were compared with the proposed CNN models. The overall results showed that the CNN outperformed the PLS and SVM on both classification and regression. The six-classification accuracy obtained by the CNN was up to 99.37%, while the R-2 of CNN regression prediction varied from 0.984 to 0.997. This study demonstrates that NIR-HSI coupled with CNN calibration provides a promising technique for the detection of MFM adulterated with PAPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据