4.7 Article

Subharmonic centrifugal pendulum vibration absorbers allowing a rotational mobility

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109125

关键词

Centrifugal pendulum vibration absorber; Non-linear dynamics; Subharmonic absorber

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses a new design of centrifugal pendulum vibration absorbers (CPVAs) to reduce vibrations in automotive transmission lines. These CPVAs use multiple masses oscillating in relation to the rotor to counteract the input torque, with features such as nonlinearity and saturation phenomena. The design also takes into consideration the rotating motion of the masses relative to the rotor, adding the advantage of rotational inertia.
Rotating machines are often subjected to fluctuating torques, leading to vibrations of the rotor and finally to premature fatigue and noise pollution. This work addresses a new design of centrifugal pendulum vibration absorbers (CPVAs), used to reduce the vibrations in an automotive transmission line. These passive devices, composed of several masses oscillating along a trajectory relative to the rotor, are here tuned at a subharmonic of the targeted harmonic torque frequency. Thanks to the inherent non-linearities, a CPVA with two masses oscillating in phase opposition is able to efficiently counteract the input torque, with particular features such as saturation phenomena. This work particularly extends previous works to a new class of CPVA, whose peculiarity is that masses admit a significant rotation motion relative to the rotor, thus adding the benefit of their rotatory inertia. Results on the system's subharmonic response and its stability are obtained thanks to an analytical perturbation method, and design guidelines are proposed. The validity of those results is also confirmed through comparisons with numerical solutions and the performance of this subharmonic system is compared to that of a classical CPVA tuned at the torque frequency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据