4.7 Article

A new method and device for detecting rebars in concrete based on capacitance

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 202, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111721

关键词

Capacitive sensor; Nondestructive testing; Finite element simulation; Equipment development

资金

  1. Major Research Development Program of China Railway [N2020G055]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2106221]
  3. Ningbo 2025 Science and Technology Major Project [2020Z035]
  4. Mount Taishan Scholar of Shandong Province [TS20190942]
  5. Education Department of Shandong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study develops a convenient and efficient rebar detection method based on capacitance to precisely locate the state of the rebars in concrete. The research optimizes the electrode of the capacitive sensor and verifies its feasibility and reliability. The relationships among capacitance, rebar diameter, and cover thickness are explored, and 3D diagrams are established to visualize the correlations.
This study aims at developing a convenient and efficient rebar detection method based on capacitance that can be used to precisely locate the state (i.e., diameter and position) of the rebars in concrete. Finite element analysis was used to optimize the electrode of the capacitive sensor and verify that using the developed capacitive sensor to detect rebar in concrete is feasible and reliable. Based on the detected capacitance, the position of the rebar in concrete can be located. The relationships among capacitance, rebar diameter, and cover thickness are explored. Both the peak value and the peak area of capacitance evolve linearly with rebar diameter and exponentially with cover thickness. The 3D diagrams among the capacitance peak value, peak area, and rebar diameter or cover thickness are established in this research. The experimental result agrees well with the numerical results, which verifies the reliability of the capacitive sensor and detection methods established.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据