4.2 Article

Effect of Infliximab and Adalimumab on Experimental Colitis Following Orally Supplemented Iron

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 6-12

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2016.1215574

关键词

experimental colitis; ulcerative colitis; Crohn's disease; inflammatory bowel disease; iron; anemia; infliximab; adalimumab; biologic agents

类别

资金

  1. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
  2. Experimental Research Center, ELPEN Pharma, Athens, Greece

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Orally administered iron can induce colonic inflammation in healthy animals and aggravate experimental colitis. Aim: To investigate the influence of the biologic agents infliximab and adalimumab on the severity of TNBS colitis following orally supplemented iron. Materials-Methods: 204 Wistar rats were allocated into 14 groups. Colitis was induced by TNBS. Iron was administered via a mouth catheter at a dose of 0.027, 0.3, and 3%/kg diet per day, respectively. Infliximab was subcutaneously administered on the 2nd and 6th day in a dose of 5mg/kgBW, while adalimumab was administered on the 2nd day in a dose of 2mg/kgBW. On the 8th day, all animals were euthanatized. Activity of colitis and extent of tissue damage were assessed histologically. Tissue Tumor Necrosis Factor- (t-TNF-) and malondialdehyde (t-MDA) were estimated. Results: In normal rats both agents significantly worsen the degree of inflammation induced by moderate or high iron supplementation despite the disappearance of t-TNF-, and reduction of t-MDA. In the groups of TNBS colitis and moderate or high iron administration, both agents again significantly worsen the degree of inflammation despite the significant reduction in the t-TNF- and t-MDA. Conclusion: Adalimumab and infliximab do not ameliorate the inflammation in TNBS-induced colitis aggravated by orally administered iron. These findings might be clinically relevant in patients with active IBD under concurrent treatment with biologic agents and per oral iron.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据