4.6 Article

The effects of annealing process on the characteristics of β-In2S3 powder in pellet form

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2022.106717

关键词

beta-In2S3; Annealing; Raman analysis; SEM; Bang gap energy; Conductance

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University [22UQU4331172DSR02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thin-film-based solar cells are being widely investigated as a sustainable energy source, and this study explores the effect of annealing temperature on the physical properties of In2S3 and its implications for photovoltaic devices. The results show the formation of indium oxide at high annealing temperatures, and the annealing temperature also affects the band gap energy and conductivity of the samples.
Due to its significant expansion as a sustainable energy source, the investigation of thin-film-based solar cells is a very important field of research among materials scientists. Nowadays, CdTe based photovoltaic devices are developed using indium sulfide (In2S3) as potential material. This study reports the effect of the annealing temperature, up to 450 degrees C, on In2S3 physical properties, and the consequences for the use of the In2S3 in photovoltaic devices. Structural analysis on indium sulfide pellets, made from commercial indium sulfide powder, reveals that all the samples are polycrystalline, crystallizing in the tetragonal structure (beta phase). Above the annealing temperature of 400 degrees C, indium oxide (In2O3) is also detected. Optical absorption, in the visible and near-infrared region, is close to zero for all the samples (as-prepared and annealed). The measured band gap energy decreases with annealing temperature up to 350 degrees C, and increases above this temperature. The conductance of the samples increases with increasing measured temperature, confirming the semiconductor behavior. This work provides an example of the potential application of beta-In2S3 , in the powder form, for environmental rehabilitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据