4.7 Article

High entropy alloy reinforced aluminum matrix composites prepared by novel rotation friction extrusion process: Microstructure and mechanical properties

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.143789

关键词

Aluminum matrix composite; High entropy alloy; Rotation friction extrusion; Microstructure; Mechanical property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51865035, 52105355]
  2. Aviation Science Funds of China [2020Z048056002]
  3. Science and Tech- nology Cooperation Special Project of Jiangxi Province [20212BDH81007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel RFE process was used to fabricate CrMnFeCoNi HEA particles reinforced AMCs. The study showed that HEA particles reacted violently with the Al matrix, leading to the formation of fine grains and numerous second phases. The AMCs exhibited enhanced tensile strength compared to RFEed Al, but lower uniform elongation.
A novel rotation friction extrusion (RFE) process was taken to fabricate CrMnFeCoNi high entropy alloy (HEA) particles reinforced aluminum matrix composites (AMCs). The experimental methods and the first principle calculation based on density functional theory were employed to study the microstructure and mechanical properties of the composites. Results showed that the HEA particles reacted violently with the aluminum (Al) matrix during RFE. The average grain size of the AMCs was 3.6 mu m, which was significantly lower than that of the RFEed Al (13.2 mu m). Numerous second phases with FCC structure were formed, as a result of the large ther-modynamic driving force and the enhanced element interdiffusion. The tensile strength of the AMCs showed substantially enhanced compared to that of RFEed Al, which could be ascribed to load transfer, dislocation strengthening, fine-grained strengthening and Orowan strengthening. The uniform elongation of the AMCs was lower than that of the RFEed Al, which was explained by the fine grain size of the AMCs resulting in high dislocation dynamic recovery rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据