4.6 Article

High corrosion resistance of reduced graphene oxide coated 316L stainless steel bipolar plate for proton exchange membrane fuel cell prepared by a facile method

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 290, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126663

关键词

Reduced graphene oxide; Metallic bipolar plate; Graphene oxideadsorbing-H2 reducing method; Corrosion resistance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52001214, 51902204]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M672796]
  3. Bureau of Industry and Information Technology of Shenzhen [201901171518]
  4. Shenzhen Science and Technology Program [KQTD20190929173914967]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that utilizing GO adsorbing-H2 reducing method improves the corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel bipolar plates in PEMFC, with the rGO coating showing significantly higher corrosion resistance compared to bare 316L stainless steel.
Metallic bipolar plate suffers corrosion attack in the harsh proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) environments, which will lead to pronounced deterioration of the full cell output performance. Depositing a Graphene coating on the metallic bipolar plate surface is a promising approach to solving the problem. In this investigation, a facile method of graphene oxide (GO) adsorbing followed by H2 reducing is developed to prepare reduced graphene oxide (rGO) coating on the 316 L stainless steel bipolar plate. Benefiting from the good ion diffusion inhibition property of rGO nanosheets, the corrosion current density at the PEMFC cathodic working potential for the rGO coated 316 L is 0.115 mu A cm 2, which is over 50 times lower than that for bare 316 L stainless steel (9.71 mu A cm 2). After 24 h potentiostatic tests, rGO coated 316 L is able to maintain its high corrosion resistance (0.155 mu A cm 2). GO adsorbing-H2 reducing is an effective approach to improving the corrosion resistance of 316 L stainless steel bipolar plate for PEMFC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据