4.7 Article

A state-of-the-art guide to the sterilization of thermoplastic polymers and resin materials used in the additive manufacturing of medical devices

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 223, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111119

关键词

Sterilization; Medical device; Mechanical test; Structural analysis; Polymer; Cytotoxicity; Additive Manufacturing; 3D Printing; Disinfection

资金

  1. UP MS grant [EFOP-3.6.1-16-2016-00004, GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00022]
  2. Establishment of the Center of Excellence in Defense Health at the University of Pecs Medical School [KA-2019-40, KA-2020-09]
  3. University of Pecs [TKP2021-NVA-06]
  4. [2020-4.1.1-TKP2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the effect of different sterilization and disinfection methods on the most commonly used additive manufacturing technologies and materials in medical device development. The results show significant structural or aesthetic alterations after the sterilization and disinfection treatments, but no significant cytotoxic effect is observed.
Continuous development of additive manufacturing technologies has reached new areas, including med-ical research and healthcare applications, where precision, highly accurate reproducibility, disinfection, or even sterility of the end product is essential. The study aims to critically evaluate the effect of different sterilization and disinfection methods for most commonly used additive manufacturing technologies and materials in medical device development: PLA (polylactic acid), PETG (polyethylene terephthalate glycol), ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene), and HIPS (high impact polystyrene) for material extrusion technol-ogy (FFF; fused filament fabrication), polyamide (PA2200) for powder bed fusion technology (SLS; selec-tive laser sintering), MED610TM for PolyJetTM material jetting, and standard FormlabsTM white resin (V4) for SLA (stereolithography) technology. The materials were tested before and after different sterilization and disinfection protocols, including treatment with 70% ethanol, chlorine solution, H2O2 plasma sterilization, autoclave and dry heat sterilization, applying 10 and 20 cycles in all cases. Bacteriostatic/fungistatic and sterility tests were performed using Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida albicans as refer-ence strains. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using A549 cells. The samples showed significant structural or aesthetic alterations detected by various mechanical tests, scanning electron microscopy, or differential scanning calorimetry (DSC-TGA). No significant cytotoxic effect was revealed during the experiment. Our results can serve as a guide for the selection of effective sterilization and disinfection methods for the most common materials used in 3D printing in medical and healthcare applications.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据