4.7 Article

Synthesis of Bioactive Silver Nanoparticles Using New Bacterial Strains from an Antarctic Consortium

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md20090558

关键词

nanomaterials; green synthesis; capped nanoparticles; antimicrobial activity; nosocomial pathogens

资金

  1. European Commission [PNRA18_00133 2020-2022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using three bacterial strains isolated from a consortium associated with the Antarctic marine ciliate Euplotes focardii. The AgNPs exhibited absorption peaks in the UV-Vis spectra and demonstrated significant antimicrobial activity. This biosynthesis method holds promise as an alternative to conventional antibiotics for combating common nosocomial pathogens.
In this study, we report on the synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) achieved by using three bacterial strains Rhodococcus, Brevundimonas and Bacillus as reducing and capping agents, newly isolated from a consortium associated with the Antarctic marine ciliate Euplotes focardii. After incubation of these bacteria with a 1 mM solution of AgNO3 at 22 degrees C, AgNPs were synthesized within 24 h. Unlike Rhodococcus and Bacillus, the reduction of Ag+ from AgNO3 into Ag-0 has never been reported for a Brevundimonas strain. The maximum absorbances of these AgNPs in the UV-Vis spectra were in the range of 404 nm and 406 nm. EDAX spectra showed strong signals from the Ag atom and medium signals from C, N and O due to capping protein emissions. TEM analysis showed that the NPs were spherical and rod-shaped, with sizes in the range of 20 to 50 nm, and they were clustered, even though not in contact with one another. Besides aggregation, all the AgNPs showed significant antimicrobial activity. This biosynthesis may play a dual role: detoxification of AgNO3 and pathogen protection against both the bacterium and ciliate. Biosynthetic AgNPs also represent a promising alternative to conventional antibiotics against common nosocomial pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据