4.7 Article

Probiotic Gac fruit beverage fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei: Physiochemical properties, phytochemicals, antioxidant activities, functional properties, and volatile flavor compounds

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113986

关键词

Gac fruit; Lactobacillus paracasei; Probiotic juice; Carotenoids; Volatile compounds

资金

  1. Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. program Scholarship
  2. National Research Council of Thailand [NRCT] [PHD/0038/2561, N42A640325]
  3. 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Scholarship [Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund] [GCUGR1125651057D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully developed a probiotic beverage from fermented Gac juice (GJ) with increased bioactive phytochemicals and functional properties. The fermented GJ showed improved cholesterol metabolism.
This study aimed to develop a probiotic beverage from Gac juice (GJ) at 5-10 g/100 g fermented with L. paracasei CASEI 431 at 37 degrees for 24 h. Probiotic viability, physicochemical properties, phytochemicals, anti-oxidant activity, volatile flavor compounds, and sensory acceptability of fermented GJ were investigated. A decrease in pH value and sugar content with an increase in organic acids (lactic and acetic acid) and probiotic viability were detected after GJ fermentation. Interestingly, the beta-carotene content, DPPH radical scavenging activity, ferric reducing antioxidant power, and lipid peroxidation inhibition capacity of fermented GJ were all higher than those of non-fermented GJ. Furthermore, fermented GJ at 10 g/100 g showed a remarkable ability to disrupt cholesterol micellization formation and increase bile acid binding activity. The fermentation of GJ introduced various volatile compounds without affecting sensory acceptability. The findings suggest that GJ might be a promising ingredient for developing a non-dairy probiotic beverage with increased bioactive phy-tochemicals and functional properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据