4.3 Article

Universal posttransplant cyclophosphamide after allogeneic transplant, a retrospective single institution study

期刊

LEUKEMIA RESEARCH
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106934

关键词

Allogeneic; Graft-versus-host disease; Transplantation; Racial disparities; Haploidentical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide can decrease graft-versus-host disease, supporting current donor selection algorithms. However, the findings of decreased survival and increased NRM in Black patients requires further investigation.
Background: The excellent results of posttransplant cyclophosphamide in decreasing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after haploidentical (HI) allogeneic transplant have challenged current donor selection algorithms. Patients and methods: We compared outcomes after matched sibling (MSD) versus alternative donor transplant using identical graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis including posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy. Endpoints included engraftment, time outside of the hospital in the first 100 days after transplant, overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and percentage of patients disease-free and off immunosuppression (DFOI) at one year and at the last follow-up. Results: There were significant differences at baseline between matched donor versus HI donor transplants with higher disease-risk index (DRI), more female-to-male donor recipient pairs and a higher percentage of Black patients in the HI group. Engraftment and time out of the hospital favored MSD and matched unrelated donor transplants. Multivariate analysis showed that high DRI and Black race were associated with decreased survival and Black race was associated with a higher NRM. Conclusions: With the use of PTCy, our results support current donor selection algorithms. The finding of decreased survival and increased NRM in Black patients requires confirmation in a larger number of patients as well as the development of mitigation strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据