4.2 Article

Koszul algebras and Donaldson-Thomas invariants

期刊

LETTERS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS
卷 112, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11005-022-01604-4

关键词

Donaldson-Thomas invariants; symmetric quivers; quadratic algebras; Koszul duality; Lie superalgebras

资金

  1. University of Strasbourg Institute for Advanced Study (USIAS) within the French national program Investment for the future (IdEx-Unistra) [USIAS-2021-061]
  2. French national research agency project [ANR-20-CE40-0016]
  3. Institut Universitaire de France
  4. DFG [SFB-TRR 191]
  5. RSF [19-11-00056]
  6. HSE University Basic Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a new method for computing motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants of a symmetric quiver using Koszul duality between supercommutative algebras and Lie superalgebras, bypassing cohomological Hall algebras. The method involves defining a supercommutative quadratic algebra and studying the corresponding Lie superalgebra. The positivity of the invariants is proven using the Poincare series of a certain operator's kernel.
We propose a new method for computing motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants of a symmetric quiver which relies on Koszul duality between supercommutative algebras and Lie superalgebras and completely bypasses cohomological Hall algebras. Specifically, we define, for a given symmetric quiver Q, a supercommutative quadratic algebra A(Q), and study the Lie superalgebra g(Q) that corresponds to A(Q) under Koszul duality. We introduce an action of the first Weyl algebra on g(Q) and prove that the motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants of Q may be computed via the Poincare series of the kernel of the operator delta(t). This gives a new proof of positivity for motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants. Along theway, we prove that the algebra A(Q) is numericallyKoszul for every symmetric quiver Q and conjecture that it is in fact Koszul; we show that this conjecture holds for a certain class of quivers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据