4.6 Article

Ultrafast Self-Healing Superhydrophobic Surface for Underwater Drag Reduction

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 38, 期 35, 页码 10875-10885

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01566

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52005227]
  2. Natural Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province University [20KJB410003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A superhydrophobic surface with ultrafast repairability was developed for drag reduction in water. The addition of porous structures improves the drag reduction rate to 76%.
The self-healing superhydrophobic surfaces have attracted great interest owing to restoring superhydrophobicity without preparation crafts. However, the self-healing super hydrophobic surface still faces the dilemma of long repairing time. Especially in aqueous environments, superhydrophobic surfaces are highly susceptible to contamination and damage. In the current study, a superhydrophobic surface with ultrafast repairability was developed, which apply for drag reduction in aqueous medium. The prepared superhydrophobic surface can recover superhydrophobicity in only 30 s after severe physical and chemical damage. In addition, this research pioneered the combination of superhydrophobicity and porous structures for underwater drag reduction. The study of drag reduction confirms that the superhydrophobic surface can reduce the frictional drag by about 43% in the water. However, the drag reduction rate of the superhydrophobic surface with the porous structure can be improved to 76% due to increased stability of the air layer. More importantly, the porous structure with the average pore size of 50 mu m has the most excellent stability through further experiments on the underwater air layer. This is attributed to the proper size of the pore to effectively balance the capillary force and resist wetting in the marginal region. This study will bring inspiration for the large-scale application of superhydrophobic surfaces and long-term drag reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据