4.6 Article

Coagulation assays and direct oral anticoagulant levels among patients having an elective surgery or procedure

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 20, 期 12, 页码 2953-2963

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jth.15901

关键词

anticoagulants; atrial fibrillation; dabigatran; factor Xa inhibitors; humans

资金

  1. CanVECTOR [CDT - 142654]
  2. Thrombosis Canada BMS-Pfizer Fellowship Award
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CDT-142654]
  4. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coagulation testing is not a reliable method for predicting DOAC concentrations. There is a weak correlation between coagulation assay results and DOAC levels, except for a moderate correlation between thrombin time and dabigatran concentrations. Prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time have modest sensitivity but poor specificity in predicting DOAC levels.
Background The Perioperative Anticoagulation Use for Surgery Evaluation study prospectively evaluated a prespecified periprocedural interruption strategy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among patients with atrial fibrillation. Coagulation testing is widely available and frequently requested prior to invasive procedures. Coagulation assays display poor sensitivity to clinically relevant DOAC concentrations. Objectives Determine the utility of routinely available coagulation testing at predicting a DOAC concentration of We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-) of a normal coagulation assay result for identifying patients with a preprocedural DOAC level < 30 ng/ml. Results We identified weak or very weak correlations between coagulation assay results and DOAC levels in the preprocedural setting, except for a moderate correlation between the thrombin time (TT) and dabigatran concentrations (rho = 0.68; p < .001). The prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) demonstrated modest sensitivity (78.9% to 88.2%) and PPVs (76.4% to 93.1%) but poor specificity (13.2% to 53.3%) and NPVs (16.3% to 30.2%) across all three DOACs. A normal TT was associated with 100% specificity and PPV values for a dabigatran level < 30 ng/ml. A normal APTT among patients on dabigatran was associated with an LR+ of 1.671 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.297, 2.154) and an LR- of 0.395 (95% CI 0.207, 0.751) for levels The PT and APTT perform poorly at safely identifying patients with negligible DOAC levels in the preprocedural setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据