4.7 Article

Comparative analysis of poly(ether-ether-ketone) properties aged in different conditions for application in pipelines

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-022-11582-3

关键词

Aging; Poly (ether-ether-ketone); Thermal properties; Crystallinity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the aging behavior of poly(ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) in different media and found that the aging conditions had minimal effects on the physical, thermal, and mechanical properties of PEEK. The thermal stability and crystallinity of PEEK improved over time, while the mechanical properties showed greater variations in different media.
This study aimed to evaluate the aging of poly(ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) submitted to different media: in air, in water bubbled with nitrogen, in water bubbled with air, and in water at pH 4, for 90 days at temperatures of 120, 140 and 160 degrees C. The physical, thermal and mechanical properties of PEEK specimens were evaluated before and after aging. The density measurements showed that the aging conditions employed did not promote water absorption or mass loss; thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) showed that all aging media exerted the same effects on the material's thermal stability, with variation in the initial thermal degradation (T-onset) below 5 degrees C concerning the unaged polymer. The thermal history obtained by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) did not show significant variations in thermal transition temperatures in the first heating cycle, indicating that the aging conditions did not cause internal degradation in PEEK samples within the studied period. The degree of crystallinity calculated by X-ray diffractometry (XRD) and DSC demonstrated a slight increase over time due to thermal annealing at temperatures above the T-g of the unaged PEEK. The mechanical properties of the aged PEEK showed low variations in Young's modulus and greater variations in the tension at rupture and elongation at rupture, being more drastic in the aqueous media saturated in air and acid solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据