4.5 Article

Effect of yarns in multiple directions on impact resistance of aramid/epoxy composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE TEXTILE INSTITUTE
卷 114, 期 8, 页码 1246-1256

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2022.2131358

关键词

Composite materials; structural performance; energy absorption; impact resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through studying the different yarn arrangements of aramid/epoxy resin composites, it is found that the composite with a yarn arrangement order of 90 degrees/45 degrees/-45 degrees/0 degrees has better impact resistance and energy absorption capacity.
In order to study the arrangements of yarns on the impact resistance of aramid/epoxy resin composites better, 0 degrees/90 degrees/0 degrees/90 degrees is the basic control group. In addition, three different arrangements are adopted for yarn laying, and the structures are 0 degrees/90 degrees/-45 degrees/45 degrees, 90 degrees/45 degrees/-45 degrees/0 degrees, -45 degrees/0 degrees/90 degrees/45 degrees respectively. In this paper, the interfacial bonding strength of composite materials is tested by yarn pull-out test. Drop hammer impact test is used to observe the impact resistance of composite materials; scanning electron microscopy was used for characterization to investigate the damage mechanism of fiber. The results show that aramid fiber/epoxy resin composites with yarn arrangement order of 90 degrees/45 degrees/-45 degrees/0 degrees have better impact resistance. And its energy absorption is obvious, with a peak value of 5.6 J, which is larger than other structures. In addition, the bonding force and damage mechanisms of internal interfaces of four kinds of aramid/epoxy composites under impact load are analyzed. The same time is taken as the unified variable to judge their respective advantages and disadvantages. The morphology of microscopic damage is used as the basis for judgment, which provides references for the engineering application of materials in structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据