4.7 Article

Study on the effect of co-substitution of transition metals on O3-type Na-Mn-Ni-O cathode materials for promising sodium-ion batteries

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104565

关键词

Structural immovability; O3-type; Cathode material; Cu Ti and Mg swap; Sodium-ion batteries

资金

  1. DST SERB, New Delhi [F-24-51/2014]
  2. DST-FIST
  3. DST-PURSE
  4. UGC-SAP, New Delhi
  5. Ministry of Human Resource Development, U Policy (TNMulti Gen) , Dept. of Education, Govt. of India
  6. [EMR/2016/006302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully enhanced the structural stability and electrochemical performance of O3-type cathode materials in sodium-ion batteries by co-substituting sodium ions and transition metals.
Background: The substitution of small quantity of electrochemically inactive and active elements described a propitious strategy for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) to enrich the structural stability and electrochemical perfor-mance of O3-type cathodes. Methods: We prepared the co-substitution of (Cu and Ti) O3-Na0.9Mn0.60Ni0.30Cu0.05Ti0.05O2 (MNCT), (Ti and Mg) O3-Na0.9Mn0.60Ni0.30Ti0.05Mg0.05O2 (MNTM), (Mg and Cu) O3-Na0.9Mn0.60Ni0.30Mg0.05Cu0.05O2 (MNMC), and bare O3-Na0.9Mn0.60Ni0.40O2 (MN) cathode materials by typical solid state reaction for SIBs. Significant findings: From Rietveld refinement, the MNCT, MNTM and MNMC cathode materials revealed a rhombohedral structure with the space group (R-3m), in which sodium ions occupied octahedral site. The MNCT, MNTM, MNMC and MN electrodes have discharge capacities of 184, 179, 174, and 218 mAh g(-1) in a voltage range of 2-4 V at 0.1C rate, respectively. The bare MN system suffered the structural stability, it was rectified upon co-substituting with two different combinations using the partial amount of copper (Cu), titanium (Ti) and magnesium (Mg). The substitution in transition metal oxide (TMO2) layers enriched structural immovability of the O3-type cathode materials during electrochemical reaction for rechargeable SIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据