4.6 Article

Modal analysis of novel coronavirus (SARS COV-2) using finite element methodology

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105406

关键词

Modal analysis; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Finite element analysis (FEA); Natural frequencies

资金

  1. UKRI [NIF\R1 \191571, e648, EP/S036180/1]
  2. Transforming Foundation Industries NetworkPlus [EP/T001100/1]
  3. UKRI National Interdisciplinary Circular Economy Hub [EP/T024607/1]
  4. Royal Academy of Engineering [EP/V026402/1, EP/V029746/1]
  5. EURAMET EMPIR [IAPP18-19\295]
  6. British Council
  7. Royal Society [TSP1332]
  8. Resource Allocation Panel (RAP) grant
  9. [A185]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research proposes an engineering method using resonant frequencies to denature SARS-CoV-2. Through modal analysis, it was found that the natural frequency of the virus ranges from 88 to 125 MHz, which opens up new avenues for developing medical solutions to combat future pandemics.
Many new engineering and scientific innovations have been proposed to date to passivate the novel coronavirus (SARS CoV-2), with the aim of curing the related disease that is now recognised as COVID-19. Currently, vaccine development remains the most reliable solution available. Efforts to provide solutions as alternatives to vacci-nations are growing and include established control of behaviours such as self-isolation, social distancing, employing facial masks and use of antimicrobial surfaces. The work here proposes a novel engineering method employing the concept of resonant frequencies to denature SARS CoV-2. Specifically, modal analysis is used to computationally analyse the Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors i.e. frequencies and mode shapes to denature COVID-19. An average virion dimension of 63 nm with spike proteins number 6, 7 and 8 were examined, which revealed a natural frequency of a single virus in the range of 88-125 MHz. The information derived about the natural frequency of the virus through this study will open newer ways to exploit medical solutions to combat future pandemics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据