4.7 Article

Influence of irradiation parameters on the curing and interfacial tensile strength of HAP printed part fabricated by SLA-3D printing

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 42, 期 14, 页码 6721-6732

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.07.019

关键词

Hydroxyapatite; Stereolithography; Curing characteristics; Interfacial tensile strength

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [52175336]
  2. Shandong Natural Science Foun-dation of China [ZR2020ZD05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper systematically evaluates the curing and interfacial tensile strength of a hydroxyapatite (HAP) printed part fabricated by stereolithography (SLA). It investigates the influence of irradiation parameters on the curing characteristics of HAP paste and establishes a modified critical laser exposure inequation to determine the curing range of HAP paste. The paper also tests and analyzes the influence of irradiation parameters on the interfacial tensile strength of the HAP printed part.
In this paper, the curing and the interfacial tensile strength of a hydroxyapatite (HAP) printed part, fabricated by stereolithography (SLA), are systematically evaluated. First, a stable HAP paste was developed with a viscosity suitable for SLA-3D printing. In the curing process of SLA-3D printing, an evident laser removal phenomenon occurred on the upper surface of the cured HAP paste, which was not mentioned in other studies. Therefore, the influence of irradiation parameters on the curing characteristics of HAP paste was investigated, while a modified critical laser exposure inequation was established, to derive the curing range of HAP paste under a UV spot. Next, the influence of irradiation parameters on the interfacial tensile strength of HAP printed part was tested and analyzed in detail. Ideally, the laser removal site formed on the cured surface would increase the contact area with the next layer and facilitate a stronger mechanical bond between layers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据