4.7 Article

Simultaneously improving piezoelectric strain and temperature stability of KNN-based ceramics via defect design

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 939-946

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.10.061

关键词

Defect design; Piezoelectric strain; Temperature stability; Potassium sodium niobate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Piezoelectric strain and temperature stability of KNN-based ceramics sintered in reducing atmosphere are simultaneously improved through defects design of Mn doping. MnO and MnO2 impact the defects in KNN-based ceramics. Switchable defect dipoles in the ceramics enhance the reversibility of the non-180° domains switching and significantly improve the piezoelectric strain. The stable defect dipoles preserve the reversibility of the non-180° domains switching at high temperature, achieving large piezoelectric strain and excellent temperature stability.
Piezoelectric strain and its temperature stability of KNN-based ceramics sintered in reducing atmosphere are improved simultaneously via defects design of Mn doping. MnO and MnO2 as raw materials have an impact on defects in KNN-based ceramics. When the dopant changes from MnO to MnO2, the defects (Mn-Nb ''', Mn-K(center dot), Mn-Na(center dot)) concentration decrease and defects (Mn-Nb') increase. Defect dipoles (Mn-K(center dot)-V-K', Mn-Na(center dot)-V-Na', Mn-Nb '''-V-o(center dot center dot)) in poled and aged 0.94 K0.48Na0.52Nb0.96Ta0.04O3-0.06BaZrO3 + 0.08MnO ceramics form a strong restoring force for domain switching, which enhances the reversibility of the non-180. domains switching and then significantly improves piezoelectric strain. The stable defect dipoles ( Mn-K(center dot)-V-K', Mn-Na(center dot)-V-Na') form so that the reversibility of the non-180. domains switching can be preserved to high temperature. This defect dipoles design provides a general method to achieve large piezoelectric strain (582 pm/V@20 kV/cm) and excellent temperature stability (T-90 =210 degrees C).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据