4.6 Article

European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: part I - systemic therapy

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18345

关键词

atopic eczema; atopic dermatitis

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema, developed according to the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual, involves the participation of 29 experts from 12 European countries. The first part of the guideline provides general information, guidance, and detailed information on systemic treatment options, including conventional immunosuppressive drugs, biologics, and janus kinase inhibitors. The second part will cover other aspects of treatment.
The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This first part of the guideline includes general information on its scope and purpose, the health questions covered, target users and a methods section. It also provides guidance on which patients should be treated with systemic therapies, as well as recommendations and detailed information on each systemic drug. The systemic treatment options discussed in the guideline comprise conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, ciclosporin, glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil), biologics (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, omalizumab and tralokinumab) and janus kinase inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib). Part two of the guideline will address avoidance of provocation factors, dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine, educational interventions, occupational and psychodermatological aspects, patient perspective and considerations for paediatric, adolescent, pregnant and breastfeeding patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据