4.6 Article

Electrochemical Performance of Sandwich-Like Porous Co3O4 Nanostructures on Nickel Foam

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac99a4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shaanxi Coal Industry Group United Fund of China [2019JLM-2]
  2. Xi'an Science research project of China [2021XJZZ0042]
  3. Royal Society [IEC/NSFC/201078]
  4. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Co3O4 is a promising anode material for high-performance lithium-ion batteries due to its high specific capacity. However, its poor conductivity and volume expansion during electrochemical reactions limit its practical application. In this study, a novel sandwich-like Co3O4 nanostructure was synthesized by adjusting the ratio of ammonium fluoride and urea during hydrothermal reactions. The resulting composite electrode exhibited outstanding reversible capacity even at high current densities.
Co3O4 is a good anode candidate for high-performance lithium ion batteries (LIBs), attributed to its high specific capacity. However, due to its poor conductivity and significant volume expansion during electrochemical reactions, electrochemical performance of Co3O4 electrode is quite poor for practical applications. Co3O4 electrodes with various micro-/nanostructures have been designed and synthesized but their performances are still unsatisfied. In this study, we propose and develop a novel sandwich type of Co3O4 nanostructures by adjusting the ratio of ammonium fluoride and urea during hydrothermal reactions. When this sandwich-like Co3O4 composite electrode was used as the electrode for LIBs, it retained an outstanding reversible capacity of 857 mAh g(-1) after 70 cycles at a current density of 500 mA g(-1). When the current density was increased to 1000 mA g(-1), the reversible capacity was kept at 865 mAh g(-1) with insignificant changes of its capacity. (c) 2022 The Electrochemical Society (ECS). Published on behalf of ECS by IOP Publishing Limited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据