4.8 Article

The Influence of the Electron Density in Acyl Protecting Groups on the Selectivity of Galactose Formation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 44, 页码 20258-20266

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c05859

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fonds National de la Recherche (FNR) , Luxembourg [ERC-2019-CoG-863934-GlycoSpec]
  2. DFG
  3. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  4. European Research Council
  5. [13549747]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates how the electron density in acyl protecting groups influences the stereoselectivity, revealing that electron-rich acylated galactose building blocks show higher alpha-selectivity, while counterparts with electron-withdrawing groups exhibit lower selectivity. Further research is needed to explore the mechanism behind this phenomenon.
The stereoselective formation of 1,2-cis-glycosidic bonds is a major bottleneck in the synthesis of carbohydrates. We here investigate how the electron density in acyl protecting groups influences the stereoselectivity by fine-tuning the efficiency of remote participation. Electron-rich C4-pivaloylated galactose building blocks show an unprecedented alpha-selectivity. The trifluoroacetylated counter-part with electron-withdrawing groups, on the other hand, exhibits a lower selectivity. Cryogenic infrared spectroscopy in helium nano -droplets and density functional theory calculations revealed the existence of dioxolenium-type intermediates for this reaction, which suggests that remote participation of the pivaloyl protecting group is the origin of the high alpha-selectivity of the pivaloylated building blocks. According to these findings, an alpha-selective galactose building block for glycosynthesis is developed based on rational considerations and is subsequently employed in automated glycan assembly exhibiting complete stereoselectivity. Based on the obtained selectivities in the glycosylation reactions and the results from infrared spectroscopy and density functional theory, we suggest a mechanism by which these reactions could proceed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据