4.8 Article

Targeted Protein Degradation by Electrophilic PROTACs that Stereoselectively and Site-Specifically Engage DCAF1

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c08964

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [AI142784, CA231991]
  2. NIH-NCI [R00CA248715]
  3. Damon-Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [DFS-53-22]
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG) Emmy Noether Programme [SCHW1851/1-1]
  5. EMBO Advanced grant [aALTF1650]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the discovery of azetidine acrylamides that react stereoselectively and site-specifically with a cysteine in the E3 ligase substrate receptor DCAF1. These findings have the potential to develop electrophilic proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) for targeted protein degradation and uncover ligandable sites on E3 ligases that support this process.
Targeted protein degradation induced by heterobifunctional compounds and molecular glues presents an exciting avenue for chemical probe and drug discovery. To date, small-molecule ligands have been discovered for only a limited number of E3 ligases, which is an important limiting factor for realizing the full potential of targeted protein degradation. We report herein the discovery by chemical proteomics of azetidine acrylamides that stereoselectively and site-specifically react with a cysteine (C1113) in the E3 ligase substrate receptor DCAF1. We demonstrate that the azetidine acrylamide ligands for DCAF1 can be developed into electrophilic proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) that mediated targeted protein degradation in human cells. We show that this process is stereoselective and does not occur in cells expressing a C1113A mutant of DCAF1. Mechanistic studies indicate that only low fractional engagement of DCAF1 is required to support protein degradation by electrophilic PROTACs. These findings, taken together, demonstrate how the chemical proteomic analysis of stereochemically defined electrophilic compound sets can uncover ligandable sites on E3 ligases that support targeted protein degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据