4.2 Article

Kinetic study of Hg(II)-promoted substitution of cyanide from hexacyanoferrate(II) in an anionic surfactant medium by 2,2′-bipyridine

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURFACTANTS AND DETERGENTS
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 13-22

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsde.12622

关键词

2,2 '-bipyridine; activation parameters; critical micellar concentration; hexacyanoferrate(II); kinetics and mechanism; surfactant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kinetic investigation of the Hg(II)-promoted reaction between [Fe(CN)(6)](4-) and 2,2'-bipyridine (Bipy) in anionic SDS micellar medium was examined. The results showed that pH, [Hg2+], and [SDS] were the crucial factors affecting the reaction rate.
The kinetic investigation of Hg(II)-promoted reaction between [Fe(CN)(6)](4-) and 2,2'-bipyridine (Bipy) has been performed in anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micellar medium by recording the surge in absorbance at 400 nm, corresponding to ultimate reaction product [Fe(CN)(4)Bipy](2-) using UV-visible spectrophotometer. Pseudo-first-order condition has been used to examine the progress of reaction as a function of temperature, [Fe(CN)(6)(4)(-)], ionic strength, [SDS], pH, [Hg2+], and [Bipy] by changing one parameter at a time. The results exhibit that [Hg2+], [SDS], and pH are the decisive parameter showing maximum reaction rate at 1.5 x 10 -4 mol dm(-3), 6.0 x 10(-3) mol dm(-3), and 3.8, respectively. [Fe(CN)(6)](4-) does not show any appreciable effect on the critical micellar concentration (CMC) of SDS as the polar head of SDS and [Fe(CN)(6)](4-) both are negatively charged. Variable order kinetics was observed for [Fe(CN)(6)](4-) and Bipy in their examined concentration range. The reverse response observed in the reaction rate with [KNO3] shows a negative salt effect. The K+ provided by K-4[Fe(CN)(6)] and KNO3 decreases the repulsion between the negatively charged heads of the surfactant molecules thereby decreasing the CMC of SDS. The negative value for the entropy of activation also supports the interchange dissociative (I-d) mechanism recommended by us.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据