4.5 Article

The effect of equipment design and process scale-up on supercritical CO2 extraction: Case study for Silybum marianum seeds

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2022.105676

关键词

Milk thistle; Cost estimation; ScCO2; SFE scale-up

资金

  1. Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (NAWA), Warsaw, Poland [PPN/ULM/2020/1/00023/U/00001]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [451-03-68/202214/200135]
  3. European Commission [CA18224]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study focused on improving the supercritical fluid extraction process for recovering valuable extract from Silybum marianum seeds. The effects of temperature and pressure on the extraction process were investigated, and the equipment design and process scale-up were also studied. The results showed successful transfer of the laboratory-scale extraction process to a semi-industrial scale, and the estimated cost for supercritical extract production in Poland was determined.
The present study was focused on improving the supercritical fluid extraction process dedicated to the recovery of highly valuable extract from Silybum marianum seeds. At first, the process was tested using supercritical CO2 at temperatures of 40 and 80 degrees C and pressures ranging from 100 to 300 bar. Obtained values were described using two literature models with acceptable agreement of experimental and calculated data. Further, the effect of the equipment design and process scale-up was investigated in four high-pressure units having volumes in the range from 280 mL to 40 L resulting in extraction yields up to 26 %. Based on the values of the parameters determined at the laboratory scale, the extraction process was successfully transferred to a semi-industrial scale. Finally, estimated costs for supercritical extract production in Poland for the year 2021 using a 1000 L high-pressure unit amounted to the price of 35.9 EUR per kg of extract.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据