4.5 Article

Multivariate workload and resource prediction in cloud computing using CNN and GRU by attention mechanism

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 3437-3470

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-022-04782-z

关键词

Cloud computing; Workload prediction; Multivariate time series; Deep learning; Attention mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a hybrid method for predicting multivariate time series workload of host machines in cloud data centers. It constructs a training set through statistical analysis, extracts hidden spatial features using convolutional neural networks, and extracts temporal correlation features using a GRU network optimized with attention mechanism.
The resources required to service cloud computing applications are dynamic and fluctuate over time in response to variations in the volume of incoming requests. Proactive autoscaling techniques attempt to predict future resource demand and assign resources before the request. Thus, establishing accurate prediction methods optimizes resource allocation and avoids service-level agreement violations (SLA). Most existing methods for predicting resource usage in cloud computing rely on univariate time series prediction models. These models consider only a single resource usage metric, make future predictions based on historical data for the target metric, and provide predictions for a single step ahead. This paper provides a hybrid method for multivariate time series workload prediction of host machines in cloud data centers that predicts the workload for the next few steps. First, a statistical analysis is used to construct the training set. Then, a convolutional neural network (CNN) is employed to extract the hidden spatial features between all correlated variables. Finally, the spatial features extracted by the CNN are fed into a GRU network optimized with the attention mechanism in order to extract the temporal correlation features. Two experiments employing Google cluster data were conducted to evaluate the proposed method. Experimental results reveal that our method improves prediction accuracy by 2% to 28% compared to baseline methods and previous research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据