4.5 Review

Cutaneous Involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review for the Rheumatologist

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 27-35

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.220089

关键词

autoimmune; skin; systemic lupus erythematosus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The majority of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) exhibit skin manifestations, which can be classified as SLE-specific or SLE-nonspecific based on histopathologic findings. SLE-specific skin diseases include chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), subacute CLE, and acute CLE, each with different subsets of skin lesions and varying likelihood of associated SLE. SLE-nonspecific lesions are more common and tend to coincide with active systemic disease, and can also be seen in other connective tissue diseases. Familiarity with the spectrum of cutaneous diseases in SLE is important for rheumatologists to prognosticate systemic disease likelihood and ensure timely dermatologic care for controlling disease activity and preventing damage.
The majority of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have cutaneous manifestations at some point in their disease course. The skin findings in SLE are classified as SLE-specific or SLE-nonspecific based on histopathologic findings. SLE-specific skin diseases include chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), subacute CLE, and acute CLE. There are subsets of skin lesions within each group and the likelihood of associated SLE varies among them. SLE-nonspecific lesions are more common in patients with SLE and tend to coincide with active systemic disease. SLE-nonspecific lesions may be seen as a feature of another disease process, including other connective tissue diseases. It is important for the rheumatologist to be familiar with the spectrum of cutaneous diseases in SLE to help prognosticate the likelihood of systemic disease and to ensure patients receive timely dermatologic care with the goal of controlling disease activity to prevent damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据