4.6 Article

Frequency-tunable sound insulation via a reconfigurable and ventilated acoustic metamaterial

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac9985

关键词

ventilation barriers; acoustic metamaterial; reconfigurable; low-frequency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62105044, 11974067]
  2. Sharing Fund of Chongqing University's Large-scale Equipment, Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC [cstc2019jcyjmsxmX0145]
  3. Key project of science and technology research program of Chongqing Education Commission of China [KJ201900138894836]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a subwavelength acoustic metamaterial based on labyrinthine structures that has tunable sound insulation and ventilation properties, potentially applicable in acoustic air vents, soundproofing windows, and duct noise control.
In acoustic engineering, sound-proofing ventilation barriers find wide applications in diverse situations. However, most of the structures only have responses with fixed frequencies and a very narrow frequency range, especially for low frequency acoustics. Here we show a subwavelength acoustic metamaterial based on labyrinthine structures, which possesses tunable sound insulation and ventilation properties. The Fano-like asymmetric transmission dips is formed by the interference between the resonant scattering of discrete states and the background scattering of continuous states. By adjusting the spacing between these two half zigzag molds, the sound insulation dip frequency can shift from 360 Hz to 575 Hz while the free ventilation area ratio is kept to over 36.3% and the total thickness is only about 0.06 lambda. Moreover, the noise peak frequency can be detected by a microphone detection and adaptive adjustment of the spacing with a small stepping motor is demonstrated, the results agree well with numerical simulations. We anticipate our design may find potential applications in acoustic air vents, soundproofing window and duct noise control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据