4.6 Article

Toward Bright Colloidal Near-Infrared Emitters: Surface Passivation of 2D PbSe Nanoplatelets by Metal Halides

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05850

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [448713396]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemein-schaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy within the Cluster of Excellence PhoenixD [EXC 2122, 390833453]
  3. Caroline Herschel program of the Leibniz Universitaet Hannover

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment with metal halides can improve the emission brightness and optical properties of colloidal 2D PbSe nanoplatelets. Surface passivation leads to a significant increase in photoluminescence quantum yield and a decrease in full width at half-maximum. This has important implications for the application of 2D PbSe NPLs in fiber optics.
Colloidal 2D PbSe nanoplatelets (NPLs) are promising near-and short wave-infrared emitters for optoelectronic applications at telecommunication wavelengths. However, their photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) is limited by the ubiquitous presence of surface-related trap states. Here, we apply a treatment of colloidal PbSe NPLs with different metal halides (MX2, M = Zn, Cd, Pb; X = F, Cl, Br, I) to improve their emission brightness. A surface passivation of the NPLs by PbI2 leads to the best results with a strongly increased PLQY (27% for PbSe NPLs emitting at 0.98 eV (1265 nm) and up to 61% for PbSe NPLs emitting at 1.25 eV (989 nm)). Simultaneously, the full width at half-maximum of the NPL photoluminescence decreased by 10% after the treatment. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and complementary surface treatment of PbSe NPLs with organic halides reveal the combined passivating role of both X-type binding halides X- and Z-type binding metal halides MX2 in enhancing the optical properties of the PbSe NPLs. Our results emphasize the potential of 2D PbSe NPLs for efficient emission tailored for the application in fiber optics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据