4.6 Article

Quantification of Hydride Coverage on Cu(111) by Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06207

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical mass spectrometry (EC-MS) combined with chronoamperometry was used to quantify the coverage of surface hydride phase on Cu(111) in 0.1 mol/L H2SO4. The study tracked the 2 atomic mass unit (amu) signal for H2 production and charge passed to examine anion desorption, hydride formation, and the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER).
Electrochemical mass spectrometry (EC-MS) is combined with chronoamperometry to quantify H coverage associated with the surface hydride phase on Cu(111) in 0.1 mol/L H2SO4. A two-step potential pulse program is used to examine anion desorption and hydride formation, and the inverse, by tracking the 2 atomic mass unit (amu) signal for H2 production in comparison to the charge passed. On the negative potential step, the reduction current is partitioned between anion desorption, hydride formation, and the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). For modest overpotentials, variations in partial processes are evident as inflections in the chronoamperometry and EC-MS signal. On the return step to positive potentials, hydride decomposition by H recombination to H2 occurs in parallel with sulfate adsorption. The challenge associated with the inherent diffusional delay in the EC-MS response is mitigated by total H2 collection and steady-state analysis facilitated by the thin-layer EC-MS cell geometry as demonstrated for the HER on a non-hydride forming Ag electrode. Analysis of the respective transients and steady-state response on Cu(111) reveals a saturated hydride fractional coverage of 0.67 at negative potentials with an upper bound charge of 106 mu C/cm2 (average electrosorption valency of r:-.:1.76) associated with adsorption of the (root 3 x root 7) mixed sulfate-water adlayer at positive potentials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据