4.6 Article

Interface-Mediated Resonant Raman Enhancement for Shear Modes in a 2D Polar Metal

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 126, 期 34, 页码 14581-14589

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c04433

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education (MOE) , Singapore [MOE2016-T2-2-132, MOE2017-T2-2-139, MOE2018- T3-1-005]
  2. MOE Research Scholarship Block
  3. Singapore National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office
  4. Horiba
  5. Penn State Center for Nanoscale Science through the National Science Foundation [DMR-2011839]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work elucidates the importance of the SiC substrate, specifically the Ga/Si interface, on the low frequency resonant Raman spectra of 2D Ga on SiC. The frequency of shear modes is modified by the presence of the substrate and strongly couples to the electronic states corresponding to the interface Ga and Si atoms. Resonant Raman enhancement occurs at laser incident energies resonant with these states, indicating the presence of strong electron-phonon coupling in these 2D polar metals.
2D polar metals synthesized by confinement heteroepitaxy at the SiC/graphene interface are covalently bound to the SiC substrate. In this work, we elucidate the importance of the SiC substrate, and specifically the Ga/Si interface, on the low frequency resonant Raman spectra of 2D Ga on SiC. The low-frequency Raman modes are dominated by in-plane shear modes in 2D Ga. We show that the frequency of these shear modes is modified by the presence of the substrate for few-layer Ga and that these shear modes couple strongly to the electronic states corresponding to the interface Ga and Si atoms. Consequently, resonant Raman enhancement occurs at laser incident energies that are resonant with the interband optical transitions involving these interface Ga and Si states. This resonant Raman enhancement is observed in laser-energy dependent measurements, an experimental signature of the strong electron-phonon coupling present in these 2D polar metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据